I recently spoke @nfptweetup with Max (and help from Yvette) about the UNICEF own a colour project. Here’s the slides for anyone interested.
To see with speaker notes please view here and use the ‘actions’ option.
I recently spoke @nfptweetup with Max (and help from Yvette) about the UNICEF own a colour project. Here’s the slides for anyone interested.
To see with speaker notes please view here and use the ‘actions’ option.
In a week where the Government’s digital champion Martha Lane Fox said there was a digital skills gap in charities [ref: ACEVO conference] it seems only right that I finally write this blog post.
Round two on what everyone ‘just doing digital’ means; “the nirvana where everyone is ‘just doing digital’ may come, but what’s the ideal transition digital team?”. I’ve been contemplating this mind boggler and avoiding writing anything for a good few weeks. But the quote from the ACEVO conference tipped me over the edge.
What does the ideal transitional digital team look like?
It might be big or small, digital all-rounders, or specialists in discrete areas. These specifics are dependent on the organisation size and needs. In this transitional time those factors are less important than the ethos and culture of the team.
I think it’s crucial that the individuals are avid life-long learners who enjoy passing on knowledge. It’s only with these traits that a digital team can help close the skills gap talked about. Remembering of course that the organisation needs to provide the space and resources that allow them to act in this capacity.
It’s even more important that the transitional digital team is not over protective or territorial. A true collaborative approach is needed to make the hub and spoke model work. Other teams need to bring their expertise to the table and own the integration of digital into their work. This means a digital team letting go – occasionally even if you’re doubtful something will be a success. As long as the risk isn’t high, letting others learn through trial and error is the quickest way.
Being a change agent isn’t without its challenges. So patience and persistence are the final facets of a great digital transitional team.
So… what do you think? Are there other skills digital charities teams need right now?
BTW: Thanks to David Bull for tweeting the quote that tipped me over.
My recent posts have sparked some real world discussions around two questions:
I’m going to explore the first question here and dedicate a separate post to the other one (watch this space!).
The easiest way to explore this question is with a definition of what everyone in an organisation ‘just doing digital’ could look like, and identifying some of the questions this creates.
Everyone is ‘just’:
So here are the questions:
I see the role of future (and perhaps existing) digital teams is to answer these questions. In fact, stepping back, these questions are not too different from those that marketing teams have worked with for a while. So a logical conclusion might be that digital teams will become the marketing teams of the future.
And so we see the rise of creative marketing technologists – this presentation summarises it nicely.
So what do you think? Are you a future creative marketing technologist?
If I had a penny for every time someone asked me where a digital team should sit within an organisation I’d have a lot of pennies. The debate has changed over the years as digital has become more important but the core consideration remains the same.
So I always find it useful to start with my own personal context. As someone who has worked in digital for my entire career I’ve been ‘all over the shop’:
But in my experience the digital team have always been a cross organisational team no matter where the line management happens. So back to that core consideration I mentioned; “Where will the team have the influence and resources it needs?”. A question you could ask about any team in any organisation, but it’s the need that might be different.
A digital team needs to be more than just a service team during this time of transition between traditional and digital mediums and ways of working. A digital team which is only about direct delivery misses the opportunity to catalyse the skills and behaviour change that is needed for the whole organisation to embed digital.
As I alluded to in my post which mentioned the hub and spoke model, there will be a time when everyone needs to ‘do’ digital and it’s not far off. I often use two analogies to explain this:
Any organisation which isn’t leveraging the expertise of its digital team to change the ways of working and spread digital skills across the organisation is, in my opinion, going to be left behind. So the team should sit wherever in the organisation it’s possible for this to happen, and that depends on the organisation.
Let me get to the point – you will never have enough people in your digital team to do everything your charity needs to do digitally. There will always be something you don’t know and something that blows your ‘to do’ list out of the water.
I completely advocate a hub and spoke model where shared ownership for delivery of digital activity sits across the entire organisation. This is enabled by a central digital team who develop and oversee a framework (tools, guides, training, processes etc) that empowers the whole organisation, a team who are able to drive a digital strategy and also trend spot for the next big thing. At times of course the central team will still have to knuckle down and deliver too.
So it’s rather convenient that my new role of Head of Digital Engagement for UNICEF UK comes with a recently formed and aptly named Digital hub team!
Spreading the work is of course the most obvious benefit but there’s a few others worth highlighting:
It can take a while to get this mindset and way of working spread through an organisation. After my three years at British Heart Foundation I think we were there with some teams and activities but still had work to do in to do in some areas. Getting there was a mixture of tactical development of the framework/s and individual confidence and skills, accompanied with strategic re-enforcement, sharing successes, learning and painting a picture of the future.
Of course there are pitfalls of this model. But I’m not sure any is significant enough to persuade me that the hub and spoke model isn’t what every organisation should be striving for. If you think I’m wrong – you know where the comments box is 🙂
Microsites aren’t bad intrinsically – they’ve just often been a lazy (sometimes expensive) way to avoid integration considerations when delivering a campaign. Fortunately it seems the needless spawning of microsites has very much slowed as many brands have realised the same aims through social media and better use of their main sites. In fact it feels a bit old school to write about them but a recent experience has made it quite fresh for me.
While at BHF I worked very hard to streamline a vast number of microsites during my three years working there ( I think we went from around 30 sites to 6). I was really quite chuffed to have shifted the culture so much and saved vast amounts of money in doing so. But before I left we broke my no microsite policy for a campaign. So why did we break the rule?
Here’s a summary of the questions that made it happen. They might be useful as a decision discussion tool if you find yourself in a similar situation.
So what happened after the campaign?
Exactly as expected, the microsite traffic plummeted, but we’d planned ahead and had our exit strategy ready. We’d purposely had assets designed with the main site in mind too – so we migrated the useful stuff to the main site, redirected the domain and called it a day.
It’s been a little while since Twestival in March so I thought it was about time I penned a short blog piece on it.
I’d been aware of Twestival for a while and so when Amanda, Twestival’s founder, called out for volunteers with social media skills I jumped right in and offered my time.
I was one of around 15 people on the worldwide social media team- a few working in each country. We were there to take the pressure off the regional co-ordinators so they could work with each of the local cities in their region. It was a new role/team for Twestival and so it started off a little loose and ready to be shaped by everyone. But it was clear from the start that we were bubbling with ideas.
Harnessing it was harder as we were lacking definition and all looking to each other to make the first move. So it was great when one of the global Twestival team stepped in to give direction – he gave shape to our responsibilities and we agreed who was taking the lead on different things.
What Twestival really demonstrates is the power of a loosely formed network connected together through social media. Success in this can only come from an organisation trusting the network and letting the network shape the activity rather than having a top down approach.
Completely unconnected to Twestival I’ve been reading some of the free MIT course notes and this quote really struck me:
“The rise of networks… means that conflicts may increasingly be waged by ‘networks’ perhaps more than by ‘heirachies’. It also means that whoever masters the network form stands to gain the advantage” – John Arquilla & David Ronfeldt, Networks and Netwars (Rand 2001).
This quote was in the context of Al Queda and conflict – but turning it on it’s head and thinking about it in the context of doing good works just as well, and Twestival proves it.
So I absolutely and totally agree with Cian’s blog post which has some great references on networks. This digest of how the Plymouth City Twestival engaged volunteers is also pretty insightful too.
QR codes are those funny looking squares of black and white that have started to crop up on printed adverts. They’re a way to send someone straight from a printed advert to a website. Sounds great right? No way someone will forget or mistype your url, and a quick action a consumer can take to continue their journey with you.
Personally I think they’re pants. I’m somewhat contradicting the general view of others (Third Sector 2009, e-consultancy 2011) so here’s why:
Of course you can always disagree with me – that’s what blog comments are for. And the Know How Non-Profit QR How To Guide might be useful for you too.
I recently spoke at the Third Sector Digital Fundraising Conference and gave a very hurried run through of our Mending Broken Hearts campaign. This is by far the biggest and most integrated campaign the British Heart Foundation have done. It blends an awareness message with a fundraising call to action.
It’s still early days as the appeal is for five years, but we’re already seeing the benefits of integrating across digital and traditional channels. So for anyone who wasn’t there on the day here’s the slide deck.